Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Journal of Clinical Hepatology ; (12): 1811-1815, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-825039

ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and clinical effect of pancreaticoduodenectomy with total mesopancreas excision (TMpE) versus traditional pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in the treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma and periampullary cancer. MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP were searched for the Chinese and English articles on the clinical effect of TMpE and PD in the treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma and periampullary cancer published from January 2007 to February 2020. Quality assessment was performed for the articles included, and Revman 5.3 software was used to perform the Meta-analysis. ResultsFive retrospective cohort studies were included after screening, with a total of 358 patients, among whom 188 underwent TMpE and 170 underwent PD. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with the PD group, the TMpE group had a significant increase in the incidence rate of pancreatic fistula (odds ratio [OR]=1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-2.78, P=0.04), while there was no significant difference in the incidence rate of postoperative complications between the two groups (OR=1.51, 95% CI: 0.76-2.98, P=0.24). In addition, TMpE improved R0 resection rate (OR=2.89, 95% CI: 1.30-6.43, P=0.009), number of dissected lymph nodes (mean difference [MD]=5.14, 95% CI: 4.16-6.13, P<0.001), and 1-year survival rate after surgery (OR=260, 95% CI: 1.45-4.69, P=0.001), without increasing the time of operation (MD=7.74, 95% CI: -42.84 to 58.33, P=076), intraoperative blood loss (MD = -45.89, 95% CI: -198.19 to 106.41, P=0.55), and the length of postoperative hospital stay (MD=-4.62, 95% CI: -16.60 to 7.36, P=0.45). ConclusionTMpE is safe and feasible in the treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma and periampullary cancer and has the advantages of high R0 resection rate and 1-year survival rate after surgery, and therefore, it may become a preferred treatment method for pancreatic head carcinoma and periampullary cancer.

2.
Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery ; (12): 92-95, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-816350

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the application of three-dimensional visualization technique in total mesopancreas excision(TMpE) for pancreatic head carcinoma. METHODS: From January 2013 to June 2017, 105 TMpE for pancreatic head carcinoma were performed in our institution, and clinical data of these cases were analyzed retrospectively. In order to evaluate the feasibility of operation, three-dimensional visualization techniques were applied to observe the site and size of the pancreatic head tumors, and the relationship between the tumors and peripancreatic vessels before the operation. RESULTS: The median operation time was 239 minutes, and the median blood loss was 409 mL. 29 cases with postoperative complications and no perioperative deaths. 74 patients were considered as R0 resection in final threedimensional pathologic examination, and the rate of R0 resection is 70.5%. CONCLUSION: Preoperative application of three-dimensional visualization technique in TMpE can improve preoperative assessment accuracy and increase the rate of R0 resection, in addition to reduce postoperative complications.

3.
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery ; (12): 314-317, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-745384

ABSTRACT

With the development of fine anatomy,the concept of mesopancreas has been proposed,and total mesopancreatic excision continues to be used in clinical practice.This method has become the best surgical method of pancreatic head cancer.But due to deep position of pancreas and mesopancreas,the surrounding adjacent organs and complexs tructure and other factors,experts are concerned about at the presence or absence of the mesopancreas.So the scope of clinical surgical resection structural reservations are also controversial.This article reviewed the development of embryonic development of the pancreas and the research progress in order to provide theoretical support for the study of the fine anatomy of the pancreas and the precise operation of pancreatic diseases.

4.
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery ; (12): 674-679, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-667539

ABSTRACT

Objective To review our experience in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with major vascular resection and reconstruction.Methods Of 183 patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in our department from November 2013 to January 2017,major vascular resection and reconstruction using the SMA first approach for total mesopancreas excision was performed in 7 patients.The clinical data of these 7 patients were retrospectively analyzed.Results Total 3D laparoscopic surgery was performed in all these 7 patients.The mean operation time,mean blood loss and blood flow occlusion time were (551.4 ± 83.8) min,(671.3 ± 256.3) ml and (45.8 ± 6.7) min,respectively.Six out of 7 patients were pathologically diagnosed to have pancreatic adenocarcinoma with negative surgical margins.Two patients had lymphatic metastasis (the number of metastatic lymph node was 1 in each patient).The mean number of lymph nodes resected was (12.7 ± 5.8).The portal vein-superior mesenteric vein (PV-SMV) was segmentally resected and reconstructed using an end to end anastomosis following the preoperative plan in 4 patients.These included 2 patients who underwent total pancreatectomy.The portal vein was wedge-resected and reconstructed by venorrhaphy in 2 patients.The remaining 1 patient was histopathologically diagnosed to have a mass-type chronic pancreatitis.Only 1 patient was treated in the ICU for 1 day after surgery.Post-operative complications occurred in 2 patients and they were managed with nonsurgical treatment (PV-SMV thrombosis and gastric emptying disorder in 1 and a pancreatic leakage (level A) in 1).The mean length of post-operative hospital stay was (13.7 ± 3.2) days with no in-hospital mortality.Seven patients were alive by April 2017.The mean follow-up for the 6 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma was 4.5 (3.5 ~9) months.Conclusions Based on our experience in skillful and masterly major vascular resection and reconstruction in open surgery and on our experience in standard laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy,laparoscopic pancreatieoduodenectomy combined with major vascular resection and reconstruction was feasible and safe.This surgery requires very mature skills in laparoscopic surgery.

5.
Chinese Journal of Surgery ; (12): 532-538, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-808984

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To explore the anatomical characteristics of the mesopancreas, to define the range of the total mesopancreas excision and to evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.@*Methods@#A regional anatomical and pathological study was performed on 14 cadavers with large slices and paraffin sections. The clinical and pathological data of 58 consecutive patients underwent total mesopancreas excision for pancreatic head carcinoma from January 2013 to December 2015 were prospectively collected and analysed. The perioperative morbidity, mortality and clinical outcomes of patients underwent total mesopancreas excision were compared with the patients underwent conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2010 to December 2012.@*Results@#The mesopancreas located in the retropancreatic area, extending from the head, neck, and uncinated process of pancreas to the aorto-caval groove, in which there were loose areolar tissue, adipose tissue, nerve plexus, lymphatic and capillaries. Although no fibrous sheath or fascia like mesocolorectum was found around the structures, a relatively fixed extent could be defined according to its embryologic and anatomic characters. In clinical practice, total mesopancreas excision was classified into two levels according to the extent of resection in this series: level Ⅰ was a"standard total mesopancreas excision" or"total mesopancreas excision in a narrow sense" , which was similar to the extent of standard resection from consensus statement of ISGPS. Level Ⅱ was defined as any procedure extending the range of level Ⅰ, called the"extended total mesopancreas excision" or"total mesopancreas excision in a broad sense". In TMpE group, the intraoperative blood loss( (461.4±184.5)ml vs. (532.2±319.8)ml, P=0.301), operation time( (368.6±92.5)minutes vs. (397.1±112.7)minutes, P=0.559), total complication rate (39.7% vs. 51.2%, P=0.250), fistula mortality (25.9% vs. 30.2%, P=0.628) were all reduced. There were significantly higher R0 rate (91.4% vs.76.7%, P=0.041) and more harvested lymph nodes (16.2 vs. 11.4, P=0.000) and lower total and local recurrence: rate (half-year local recurrence rate: 7.8% vs. 23.7%, P=0.036; one-year local recurrence rate: 18.2% vs. 39.5%, P=0.018) and longer disease-free survival (16.9 months vs. 13.4 months, P=0.044) and overall survival(22.5 months vs. 19.9 months, P>0.05) were also found in the study group.@*Conclusions@#Mesopancreas is different from mesorectum since it has no fascial envelop, which should be regarded as a surgical concept, rather than an anatomical structure. Total mesopancreas excision is safe and feasible for pancreatic head cancer and probably helps to increase the R0 resection rate and improve the clinical outcomes.

6.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 537-539, 2016.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-497818

ABSTRACT

As no fiber sheath covered,mesopancreas is considered to be different from mesocolon and mesorectum.Though amount of lymphatic,nervous,vascular and fat tissues are consisted in this structure,the margin and range are still controversial in the clinical practice.Only a few clinical reports show a higher R0 resection rate with the procedure of total mesopancreas excision (TMpE),but most of the studies are singlecentered and retrospective,from which we could not assess the outcome improvement for the patients undergoing TMpE.Moreover,the difference between the ranges of TMpE and ever-used extended excision or lymphectomy should be further evaluated.More anatomical and clinical studies are needed to standardize the operation range in order to benefit the patients.

7.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 615-618, 2015.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-480769

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic carcinoma is a high malignancy,as radical resection is the only cure for long-term survival.In an attempt to improve outcomes and prognosis,surgeons over the decades have employed various active surgical strategies to combat this disease.Through document analyses of radical pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma,regional lymphadenectomy,retroperitoneal nerve dissection,and combined vessel resection,the extent and disputes about radical resection for pancreatic head carcinoma are investigated.Total mesopancreas excision appears to be a novel and promising surgical procedure for the improvement of prognosis of patients with pancreatic head carcinoma.However,further studies based on the data of larger number of patients are mandatory to raise the evidence for this surgical procedure.

8.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 909-912, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-470279

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic carcinoma is a common malignancy of the digestive system,which has poor prognostic results because of its characteristics of lymphatic metastasis and perineural metastasis.Radical resection is considered as the only possible way to cure this malignant disease.As a part of the radical resection,regional lymphadenectomy has gained lots of attention,while there is no consensus regarding the extent of regional lymphadenectomy and the role of combined vessel resection.Recently,the artery-first approach and total mesopancreas excision have probed a new direction for the research of regional lymphadenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma.

9.
Chinese Journal of General Surgery ; (12): 344-347, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-447037

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the concept of artery first and total mesopancreatic excision in radical resection of pancreatic head carcinoma through both anterior and posterior approaches.Method The anterior approach was to identify the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the posterior approach to confirm the possibility of negative margin at the origin of SMA,on the posterio-lateral vascular wall of superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and the supposed posterior of the mesopancreas.The resection scope were with the celiac trunk and common hepatic artery as the upper boarder,the SMA as the left boarder,the inferior mesenteric vein (IMA) level as the lower boarder,to achieve a complete mesopancreatic excision,namely the en bloc resection of all the involved nerve,the lymph tissue and vascular tissue along the right side of the axial composed by SMA and celiac trunk.Results Of the 15 patients,11 had radical Whipple procedure,among which 2 had a combining SMV resection and reconstruction.1 case suffered from delayed gastric emptying and 2 cases from bile leakage.There was no mortality.The postoperative pathology reported carcinoma in all 11 cases,with duodenum and low bile duct involved in 4 cases,with the duodenum involved in 6 cases,no surrounding tissue involvement was identified in 1 case.Nerve involvement was found in 7 (7/11),vascular involvement in 10 (10/11),and lymphnode metastasis was (2.5 ± 3.8/12.9 ± 4.9).Conclusions The radical resection of pancreatic head carcinoma using the concept of artery first and the total mesopancreatic excision is helpful for an early evaluation of the possibility of radical resection and guarantees negative margins.

10.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 16-20, 2013.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-431756

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic carcinoma is still a challenging disease.Although there is no randomized controlled trial (RCT) results,neoadjuvant therapy is encouraged to perform on patients with borderline resectable or resectable pancreatic cancers,which could probably increase the Ro resection rates.There has been some modifications about resection approach in recent years,for example,artery first,hanging maneuver,uncinate process first,etc,which seem as safe and effective options.Because of the modification of pathologic classification of R0 and R1 resection for pancreatic cancer,the clinical outcomes of R1 resection need to be reevaluated.The extent of lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy remains controversial.Based on several RCT reports,dissection of 2nd group of lymph nodes is recommended according to the Japan Pancreas Society classification.The discussion and clinical application about the concept of mesopancreas will help to improve the status of retroperitoneal margins via standardized surgical procedures.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL